mirror of
https://github.com/ellmau/adf-obdd.git
synced 2025-12-19 09:29:36 +01:00
Add considering variable-impact to counting based stable models
This commit is contained in:
parent
39379d9e3d
commit
1f196e3cf3
@ -388,20 +388,35 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn two_val_model_counts(&mut self, interpr: &[Term]) -> Vec<Vec<Term>> {
|
||||
self.two_val_model_counts_logic(interpr, &vec![Term::UND; interpr.len()])
|
||||
self.two_val_model_counts_logic(interpr, &vec![Term::UND; interpr.len()], 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn two_val_model_counts_logic(&mut self, interpr: &[Term], must_be: &[Term]) -> Vec<Vec<Term>> {
|
||||
log::trace!("two_val_model_counts({:?}) called ", interpr);
|
||||
fn two_val_model_counts_logic(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
interpr: &[Term],
|
||||
will_be: &[Term],
|
||||
depth: usize,
|
||||
) -> Vec<Vec<Term>> {
|
||||
log::trace!("two_val_model_counts({:?}) called", interpr);
|
||||
log::debug!("two_val_model_recursion_depth: {}/{}", depth, interpr.len());
|
||||
if let Some((idx, ac)) = interpr
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.filter(|(idx, val)| !(val.is_truth_value() || must_be[*idx].is_truth_value()))
|
||||
.min_by(|(_idx_a, val_a), (_idx_b, val_b)| {
|
||||
self.bdd
|
||||
.filter(|(idx, val)| !(val.is_truth_value() || will_be[*idx].is_truth_value()))
|
||||
.min_by(|(idx_a, val_a), (idx_b, val_b)| {
|
||||
match self
|
||||
.bdd
|
||||
.models(**val_a, true)
|
||||
.minimum()
|
||||
.cmp(&self.bdd.models(**val_b, true).minimum())
|
||||
{
|
||||
// if the minimal counts are equal, choose the maximal var_impact
|
||||
std::cmp::Ordering::Equal => self
|
||||
.bdd
|
||||
.var_impact(Var(*idx_b), interpr)
|
||||
.cmp(&self.bdd.var_impact(Var(*idx_a), interpr)),
|
||||
value => value,
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut result = Vec::new();
|
||||
@ -412,6 +427,7 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
ac,
|
||||
check_models
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let _ = self // return value can be ignored, but must be catched
|
||||
.bdd
|
||||
.interpretations(*ac, check_models, Var(idx), &[], &[])
|
||||
@ -421,7 +437,7 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
let res = negative
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.try_for_each(|var| {
|
||||
if new_int[var.value()].is_true() || must_be[var.value()] == Term::TOP {
|
||||
if new_int[var.value()].is_true() || will_be[var.value()] == Term::TOP {
|
||||
return Err(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
new_int[var.value()] = Term::BOT;
|
||||
@ -430,7 +446,7 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
.and(positive.iter().try_for_each(|var| {
|
||||
if (new_int[var.value()].is_truth_value()
|
||||
&& !new_int[var.value()].is_true())
|
||||
|| must_be[var.value()] == Term::BOT
|
||||
|| will_be[var.value()] == Term::BOT
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -440,7 +456,13 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
if res.is_ok() {
|
||||
new_int[idx] = if check_models { Term::TOP } else { Term::BOT };
|
||||
let upd_int = self.update_interpretation(&new_int);
|
||||
result.append(&mut self.two_val_model_counts_logic(&upd_int, must_be));
|
||||
if self.check_consistency(&upd_int, will_be) {
|
||||
result.append(&mut self.two_val_model_counts_logic(
|
||||
&upd_int,
|
||||
will_be,
|
||||
depth + 1,
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
res
|
||||
});
|
||||
@ -452,14 +474,17 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<Term>>();
|
||||
let mut upd_int = self.update_interpretation(&new_int);
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: should be "must be true/false" instead of setting it to TOP/BOT and will need sanity checks at every iteration
|
||||
log::trace!("\nnew_int {new_int:?}\nupd_int {upd_int:?}");
|
||||
if new_int[idx].no_inf_inconsistency(&upd_int[idx]) {
|
||||
upd_int[idx] = if check_models { Term::BOT } else { Term::TOP };
|
||||
if new_int[idx].no_inf_inconsistency(&upd_int[idx]) {
|
||||
let mut must_be_new = must_be.to_vec();
|
||||
let mut must_be_new = will_be.to_vec();
|
||||
must_be_new[idx] = new_int[idx];
|
||||
result.append(&mut self.two_val_model_counts_logic(&upd_int, &must_be_new));
|
||||
result.append(&mut self.two_val_model_counts_logic(
|
||||
&upd_int,
|
||||
&must_be_new,
|
||||
depth + 1,
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
result
|
||||
@ -470,15 +495,17 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.map(|(idx, val)| {
|
||||
if !val.is_truth_value() {
|
||||
must_be[idx]
|
||||
will_be[idx]
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
*val
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<Term>>();
|
||||
// TODO: Not copletely correct - should be a check if concluded is consistant with ac
|
||||
if concluded == self.update_interpretation(&concluded) {
|
||||
vec![concluded]
|
||||
let ac = self.ac.clone();
|
||||
let result = self.apply_interpretation(&ac, &concluded);
|
||||
if self.check_consistency(&result, &concluded) {
|
||||
vec![result]
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
vec![interpr.to_vec()]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -486,8 +513,11 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn update_interpretation(&mut self, interpretation: &[Term]) -> Vec<Term> {
|
||||
interpretation
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
self.apply_interpretation(interpretation, interpretation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn apply_interpretation(&mut self, ac: &[Term], interpretation: &[Term]) -> Vec<Term> {
|
||||
ac.iter()
|
||||
.map(|ac| {
|
||||
interpretation
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
@ -503,6 +533,13 @@ impl Adf {
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<Term>>()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn check_consistency(&mut self, interpretation: &[Term], will_be: &[Term]) -> bool {
|
||||
interpretation
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.zip(will_be.iter())
|
||||
.all(|(int, wb)| wb.no_inf_inconsistency(int))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Computes the complete models
|
||||
/// Returns an Iterator which contains all complete models
|
||||
pub fn complete<'a, 'c>(&'a mut self) -> impl Iterator<Item = Vec<Term>> + 'c
|
||||
|
||||
@ -405,6 +405,16 @@ impl Bdd {
|
||||
var_set
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn var_impact(&self, var: Var, termlist: &[Term]) -> usize {
|
||||
termlist.iter().fold(0usize, |acc, val| {
|
||||
if self.var_dependencies(*val).contains(&var) {
|
||||
acc + 1
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
acc
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user